Ive een the other diffrent pictures from the original artists before im not being completely mean but havent you also wondered why all the pictures are a diffrent style too...none of her pictures are the same style...ive also noticed she must have her own signature on all of them....but she dosent
Ok, this may seem lecture-ish (my apologies), but I'm just getting my points across.
1.) You need to be more specific when you say "I've seen the other different pictures from the original artists..." otherwise that point is invalid. "The original artists" is too vague to be used as proper evidence.
2.) I think it must be subjective that the rest of the pictures don't seem to have the same style, because I disagree? I think manaita's coloring style kind of stands out.
3.) But this picture in particular does have a signature, and it belongs to manaita (the URL on the right side) so why would you comment on this picture if the other ones don't have signatures?
4.) I searched the image on google and didn't come up with any other artist results.
I think it's good that you're pointing out your suspicions about this, but you shouldn't blatantly accuse someone of plagiarism without supporting evidence, and even when questioned, you can't specifically back anything up? You should always be pretty dang sure someone stole art before you accuse them, especially personally... I mean, wouldn't you feel crappy if someone accused you of art theft? Thankfully, though, manaita either doesn't read the comments or doesn't know much English so she's most likely oblivious to all of this.
Sorry this is long... But I hope you get my point? Have a good day.